Retirement

Why Social Security WEP or GPO Could Ruin Your Retirement

Many of us are counting on ours, or our spouses’, Social Security Benefits for a significant part of our retirement income. But, if you or your spouse are government workers or teachers, you may be in for a surprise with Social Security WEP and GPO offsets. 

How the SECURE Act Could Affect Retirement Plans

secure-act-retirement-consequences.jpg

 Touted as an aid to prevent Americans from outliving their assets, be aware of the downsides of this important pending legislation.

Provided by Angel McCall CFP®

In May 2019, the House of Representatives passed the SECURE act (Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act). Even though the bill contains provisions aimed at increasing access to tax-advantaged retirement accounts, your retirement accounts will be affected in a major way. Opponents point out that it is also a money-grab bill for the government by changing withdrawal rules which may impact retirement and estate planning strategies and a windfall for annuity vendors.

The Senate is expected to pass a version of the bill probably including key elements of their “RESA” (Retirement Enhancement Security Act) which would mitigate some of the “money-grabbing” aspects of the House bill.

While proposed legislation does smooth out some of the problems with retirement savings – like removing the IRA age limitation, expanding the start for RMDs, increasing annuity options and potentially increasing the likelihood of small employers starting retirement plans – there is still a strong argument that these changes, while positive, won’t help the retirement predicament very much. Many of the changes can be viewed as only benefiting wealth IRA owners who don’t need their RMDs yet and clearly benefit the insurance annuity product providers. The annuities provided do not seem to provide any inflation protection or benefits to beneficiaries. The biggest winners for these annuities will be the insurance companies and insurance sales people.

Americans will still be facing major issues not being addressed in Congress:

  • Social Security funding

  • Rising health care costs

  • Skyrocketing drug prices

  • Strains on Medicare and Medicaid, and

  • 1/3rd of the population are not really saving for retirement

Here are the major provisions of the SECURE Act that may affect you.

1.    Increase in the Required Minimum Distribution Ages

The current law requires minimum distributions (RMDs) from retirement accounts to begin once you reach 70.5. The SECURE Act sets the age at 70.5. The RESA Act proposes to change this requirement to age 75. One criticism  of this provision is that it mostly benefits those with significant savings allowing the money to grow longer.

2.    Removal of Age Limitation on IRA Contributions

Currently, IRA contributions are not allowed after age 70.5. The SECURE Act would remove this limitation for those who continue to work later in life.

3.    Penalty-Free Distributions for Birth of Child or Adoption

The rule would allow an aggregate amount of $5,000 to be withdrawn from a retirement plan without the 10% penalty within one year of final adoption or the child’s birth. (Income taxes would be owed.)

4.    Increase Small Employer Access to Retirement Plans

Currently, SIMPLE and SEP IRAs are available, but have not been broadly utilized. They could come together to set up and offer 401(k) plans at less cost than exists today.

Many employers offer no retirement savings options at all, leaving retirement savings solely up to the employee.

5.    Reduces the number of work hours required before signing up for a 401(k) plan

This will open up plans to part-time workers.

6.    Tax Credit for Automatic Enrollment

This credit to employers would help offset the costs of setting up a plan which includes automatic enrollment of all employees.

7.    Lifetime Income Disclosure for Define Contribution Plans

Would require that at least once a year the participant would receive a projection showing how much income the balance in the account could generate.

Of course, the methodology for calculating this and the assumptions used would need to be worked out and provided to the participants.

8.    Annuity Options Inside Retirement Plans

Included as a “safe harbor” provision, this will be a boon for insurance companies. For a variety of reasons, I almost never recommend that a retirement account be put into an annuity. Even though a 401(k) rolled into an IRA needs to be “managed,” it can provide cost of living increases and can be left to beneficiaries. Even though annuities provide a fixed, lifetime benefit, a person can usually do better without them.

9.  The Hidden Money Grab of the SECURE Bill 

If you have an IRA or a retirement plan that you were hoping you could leave to your children in a tax-efficient manner after you die, then this provision could cost them dearly.

Non-spouse beneficiaries of IRAs and retirement plans currently can minimize the amount of their Required Minimum Distributions by “stretching” them over their lifetimes. The longer your beneficiaries can postpone or defer them (and taxes on the distributions) the better off they will be.

However, buried in the SECURE act is a small provision kills the “stretch IRA.” (This provision also applies to Roth IRAs -  these distributions are not taxable – but once the funds are rolled out of the Roth, their gains become taxable.)

Buried in the language of the SECURE Act, a beneficiary other than your spouse who inherits a traditional IRA or retirement plan must deplete the account within 10 years. This is a huge change from the old rules allowing withdrawals over a beneficiary’s lifetime.

SECURE-Act-Impact.png

If you are thinking, “It can’t be all that bad,” then check out this chart demonstrating the difference between you leaving $1 million IRA to your child under the existing law, and the result under the SECURE Act.

A $1M Traditional IRA is inherited by a 45 year-old child and the minimum distributions he is required to take are invested in a brokerage account.

Assumptions used for Graph:

1.       $1 Million Traditional IRA inherited by 45-Year Old Married Beneficiary

2.       7% rate of return on all assets

3.       Beneficiary’s salary $100,000

4.       Beneficiary’s annual expenses $90,000

5.       Beneficiary’s Social Security Income at age 67 $40,000

The only difference between these two is when the child pays taxes!

 The solid line represents a child who can defer (or “stretch”) the taxes over his lifetime under the current rules. At age 86, that beneficiary still has $2,000,000.

 The dashed line represents the same child if he is required to take withdrawals under the SECURE Act. Your child could be financially secure or broke at age 86!

 The Senate is working on a proposal that allows a $400,000 exclusion per beneficiary, but distribution would need to be over five years instead of ten years like the House version. The Senate version would allow more estate planning opportunities and tax savings, but this provision seems to be tied to Section 529 proposed revisions that the House voted down.

The SECURE act will impose massive taxes on families of IRA and retirement plan owners – even those with far less than $1M. Even though the Senate version has a five-year acceleration instead of a ten-year, this version could be better for most because of the value of the exclusion – especially if you have multiple beneficiaries.

Citations

1 - financial-planning.com/articles/house-votes-to-ease-rules-for-rias-correct-trump-tax-law [5/23/19]
2 - irs.gov/retirement-plans/amount-of-roth-ira-contributions-that-you-can-make-for-2019 [6/18/19]
3 - congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1994 [6/17/19]
4 - shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/benefits/pages/house-passes-secure-act-to-ease-401k-compliance-and-promote-savings.aspx
5 - law.com/newyorklawjournal/2019/04/05/what-to-know-about-the-2-big-retirement-bills-in-congress/ [4/5/19]
6 – forbes.com/sites/jlange/2019/06/11/the-hidden-money-grab-in-the-secure-act/#66b95993bbd7

 

A Guide to Withdrawing Retirement Assets

A lot is being written about how much money Americans can withdraw from their investments to fund their retirement years. Now, a new research institute launched by Fidelity Investments has outlined the order in which money should be withdrawn from various tax-deferred and taxable investment accounts. Described as the ‘withdrawal hierarchy,’ the Fidelity Research Institute suggests the order, with modifications made courtesy of other financial planning experts.

The Case for Women Working Past 65

The Case for Women Working Past 65

The median retirement age for an American woman is 62. The Federal Reserve says so in its most recent Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (2017). Sixty-two, of course, is the age when seniors first become eligible for Social Security retirement benefits. This factoid seems to convey a message: a fair amount of American women are retiring and claiming Social Security as soon as they can.1

What if more women worked into their mid-sixties? Could that benefit them, financially? While health issues and caregiving demands sometimes force women to retire early, it appears many women are willing to stay on the job longer. Fifty-three percent of the women surveyed in a new Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies poll on retirement said that they planned to work past age 65.2

Staying in the workforce longer may improve a woman’s retirement prospects. If that seems paradoxical, consider the following positives that could result from working past 65.


A Retirement Gender Gap

A Retirement Gender Gap

What is the retirement outlook for the average fifty-something working woman? ​As a generalization, less sunny than that of a man in her age group. Most middle-class retirees get their income from three sources. An influential 2016 National Institute on Retirement Security study called them the “three-legged stool” of retirement. Social Security provides some of that income, retirement account distributions some more, and pensions complement those two sources for a fortunate few.1 For many retirees today, that “three-legged stool” may appear broken or wobbly. Pension income may be non-existent, and retirement accounts too small to provide sufficient financial support. The problem is even more pronounced for women because of a few factors.

Do Our Biases Inhibit Our Retirement Savings Efforts?

Picture an 18-wheeler, its 4,000-cubic-foot cargo trailer filled to capacity with stacks of $100 bills. The driver shuts and locks the trailer, closing the door on roughly $10 billion. Now imagine that truck driving off to a landfill, where that $10 billion will be dumped, shredded and buried, rendered useless.

Do Women Face Greater Retirement Challenges Than Men?

Why are women so challenged to retire comfortably? You can cite a number of factors that can potentially impact a woman’s retirement prospects and retirement experience. A woman may spend less time in the workforce during her life than a man due to childrearing and caregiving needs, with a corresponding interruption in both wages and workplace retirement plan participation. A divorce can hugely alter a woman’s finances and financial outlook. As women live longer on average than men, they face slightly greater longevity risk – the risk of eventually outliving retirement savings.